Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underground Gaming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:09, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Underground Gaming

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable e-sports organization from Kuwait. Sources are almost all social media. This is the last remaining of a bunch of articles created by this author on the subject. JTtheOG (talk) 20:44, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kuwait-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:57, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DELETE Prize money is between 30 and 350 dollars. This is just some local thing, not a real tournament. Dream Focus 01:31, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP As long as all resources are reliable, the wiki page is still a stub so it should be fine, but no clarification for prize money on references so remove the prize money numbers Khs17 21:08, 19 June 2020 (GMT +3)
Which references are reliable sources by Wikipedia standareds? YouTube and Instagram don't count. See WP:RS Dream Focus 20:12, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
KEEPAgree with past agreement; As long as all resources are reliable, the wiki page is still a stub so it should be fine, but no clarification for prize money on references so remove the prize money numbers — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baderalfahad99 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC) — Baderalfahad99 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Comment - *sigh* He didn't even try to change the words huh? Just a straight copy-paste. JTtheOG (talk) 19:31, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails GNG due to no significant coverage in reliable, third-party published sources. Woodroar (talk) 21:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom and Woodroar. Namcokid 47 ^(Contribs) 16:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - sources are not reliable when they are self-published, since they can say anything. Also impossible to write a neutral, verifiable article without substantial coverage in third party sources, which is why we have the WP:GNG. Shooterwalker (talk) 13:44, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.