Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UK Music Video Awards

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. The Keep !vote lacks any rational at all. However with only a single pro-delete comment I could not do more than close this as a "soft delete" which is precluded by the sole keep, however unimpressive it is. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:55, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

UK Music Video Awards (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

As we may witness, the written content on the page is bolstered up mainly by primary sources. Nevertheless, some tertiary coverage is included, but these articles are mostly presented in a form of the list of winners/nominees rather than being actual journalistic pieces to be taken into account, though. I believe the criteria noted in WP:NOTESAL are not measured up to: many laureates of that awards are notable by themselves, but their arranged list may don't– This Is Where I Came In (talk) 03:24, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:22, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 14:11, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.