Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Truss ministry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 07:14, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Truss ministry

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article got there first, but theres also Premiership of Liz Truss , which is the proper name for this very distasteful subject. IMO the title of this article suggests that it woud be about her attempt at being foreign secretary. TheLongTone (talk) 15:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politics and United Kingdom. Shellwood (talk) 15:43, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Its content is not meant to resemble or be a duplicate of Premiership of Liz Truss, as far as precedent goes. Ex. Premiership of Boris Johnson, First Johnson ministry, Second Johnson ministry; Premiership of David Cameron, First Cameron ministry, Second Cameron ministry; etc. In other words, the "Premiership of Liz Truss" is going to cover the events of her tenure as Prime Minister, while "Truss ministry" will cover the people in her administration. Keivan.f^Talk 15:57, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It will be a matter of days before Truss names her Cabinet, at which point this article is justified. OGBC1992 (talk) 16:32, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – huh? I don't understand this nomination. This is the same format as it has been for other UK prime ministers; the article will be filled out in the coming days. I'm also not sure what you're referring to by "this very distasteful subject". Endwise (talk) 17:03, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - not too sure what this is all about to be honest XxLuckyCxX (talk) 17:15, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is for the list of Ministers appointed, not for the events of her premiership live the other article. PoliceSheep99 (talk) 17:37, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep- Pages that list cabinet members are standard. Truss will become Prime Minister tomorrow, so I don't see the point in deleting it now. Khronicle I (talk) 17:55, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Undeniably jumping the gun, but only by a matter of 24 hrs or so. Moscow Mule (talk) 17:56, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Truss will be appointed by the Queen tomorrow, after which she'll begin to announce her cabinet. This article is just getting everything ready and set up for when she does.GandalfXLD (talk) 18:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per everything said above, especially GandalfXLD's comment. —Sundostund (talk) 18:36, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong keep The new ministry will be formed tomorrow on 6 September. —Moondragon21 (talk) 19:41, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Kinda weird deletion nomination. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
must not be delete this page — Preceding unsigned comment added by 183.179.74.249 (talk) 00:27, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and note that the WP:SNOWBALL is rolling down the hill at pace. -- M2Ys4U ^(talk) 01:30, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep There is clear precedent as to how the articles are named for the different ministries formed by British PMs. A shame that at this important time, when everybody will want to read this article, there will be a deletion request notice above it just because of this deletion request. CrazyPredictor (talk) 01:53, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per above. If it's being formed tomorrow, no point deleting, especially since one is created for every PM. Not worth the hassle of deleting then recreating when she's sworn in. echidnaLives (talk) 02:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - The nominator might have been confused, as discussed above, and the article is both relevant and typical. Oswako (talk) 03:41, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.