Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Cunningham (Tony & Friends)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus that this article does not meet the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 22:43, 20 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Cunningham (Tony & Friends)

Contested prod. This fictional character is notable within his universe, problem is, the universe in question is not. Judging by comments on my talk page, the author seems to think that Wikipedia's policy of allowing anyone to edit is a free pass for adding any information about anything, no matter how non-notable. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 01:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete NN character, no g-hits on "Tony Cunningham"+"Tony & Friends"[1], nothing to show why this character is notable. --Terrillja _talk 01:50, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 02:19, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 04:45, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: There's not even an article on the series this character appears in. Ryan4314 (talk) 07:39, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence whatsoever for the notability of the book. The first step would be to try to write an article on the book or the series--or even the author. then would be the time to consider whether it's important enough for detailed articles like this. DGG (talk) 08:21, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't find a single piece of evidence the user had even one of those books actually published. Looks like they're using the wiki to keep a story bible for the writing process. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:16, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as even I am unable to reference and therefore rescue this article. I could not find anything in multiple searches on the work of fiction itself or even really the author, let alone this character. Obviously no prejudice against recreation down the road if new sources turn up, but at this time we cannot verify this article's contents through reliable sources and usually DGG and MaGyverMagic are persuasive as to which fictional character articles should be kept or deleted. That they both believe that this article is unsalvageable at this time is telling. Sincerely, --A Nobody^{My talk} 21:14, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I would have loved to prove the illustrious group above wrong, but I can't. Neither series nor author nor protagonist (per information on Tony201213's talk page) pass our inclusion guidelines at this point, and the information in the article is not verifiable. --Amalthea 19:09, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.