Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thomas Smale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per discussion. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thomas Smale

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No substantial coverage in reliable sources as required to meet WP:BIO. SmartSE (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:35, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete We're here to record, not promote. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:15, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Individual seems note-worthy, as I found a large number of sources from a Google search. Page should be edited. Justinkowalsky (talk) 23:00, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not yet for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:36, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nearly every cited reference is a primary source and the secondary source(s) do not establish notability. -- RM 02:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note that people have been canvassed to !vote here. SmartSE (talk) 12:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.