Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The revolution theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:23, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The revolution theory

Not notable. Seems to be a local group, with no mainstream coverage. No verifiable links and google turns up only 39 pages for the title plus the founding location of Pizza Hut. Mbisanz 05:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per - non-notable, unless third party sources can be given. --Pilotboi / talk / contribs 05:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator as well -- Xtreme racer 05:20, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. LotLE×talk 06:53, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:MUSIC. Carlosguitar 08:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. --Gavin Collins 12:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)--[reply]
Speedy Delete G12 from SLAM Omaha --Mike Vitale 14:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, total G12, dunno if I should tag it myself though and wait for AFD to run its course. Still, this group is absolutely unnotable. TheLetterM 16:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a bit new to the AFD process, so if there is a quicker way to deal with articles like this, I have no objection to using it. Mbisanz 23:09, 21 September 2007 (UTC)ň[reply]

Check out {{db-copyvio}} --Mike Vitale 23:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as copyvio, and likely nn to boot. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:14, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "what may sound like a train wreck on paper, is in actuality" ... totally non-notable. Pete.Hurd 20:41, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as this is a blatant WP:COPY vio from http://www.slamomaha.com/music/localMusicDetail.asp?band=415 as mentioned by Mike above. Additionally, even if it were re-written, it fails WP:N and WP:BAND. ^Ariel♥Gold 23:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everything said above. — Wen li ^(contribs) 01:06, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.