Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dice: Afterlife
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- The Dice: Afterlife (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Potentially fails WP:BOOKCRIT. All I can find are retailers selling the book and social media. I can't find any reviews or any other independent coverage. I don't think that the right to participate in the LGBTQ-U International Film Festival is sufficient for BOOKCRIT#2 and I can't see any WP:ATD since the author of the book, Ramil Mustafayev (Kryptohaker), is not notable and doesn't have an article. In fact, all I can find on Kryptohaker is his Twitter page with 50 followers... Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science fiction and fantasy and Literature. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 20:47, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Fails all WP:BOOKCRIT criterias. Could not find any reliable sources discussing this book. The LGBTQ-U International Film Festival inclusion doesn't make it pass criteria #2, since its not a major award. MaterialWorks ping me! 21:14, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Obviously failing WP:BOOKCRIT, no reviews or critical literary discussions have been raised around the book so far. Also there are structural error within the body of the article itself—eg. using "===" instead of "==" for first level section headings. AmshitBalcon (talk) 22:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete article is promotional, the book appears to be self-published, and no substantial coverage of the book or its author. Walt Yoder (talk) 18:41, 17 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.