Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teradata Kylo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 20:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Teradata Kylo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can't find appreciable applicable coverage based on a search for the words "kylo" and "teradata" in the same source, let alone as a fixed phrase, to establish notability. Since I posted a PROD tag, the author added one source, an O'Reilly article, that qualifies as one applicable source, but I didn't find others. (The author added another source at the same time, but it doesn't mention this software.) Largoplazo (talk) 22:12, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 09:29, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete clear promotion of a minor product by a single-purpose account. Probably not worth a redirect, but certainly the Teradata article needs to be updated to mention ThinkBig. Much other work like rewriting the timeline from bullets into prose and out of historical present, using cited sources etc. Tiny COI to disclose: I was a Teradata employee very briefly, albeit not in the ThinkBig group (which ironically might not be very "big"!). W Nowicki (talk) 17:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.