Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Team Uttejit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Team Uttejit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable racing team. I haven't managed to find any reliable third-party sources using Google. –barakokula31 (talk) 17:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:13, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, a university club or society that certainly doesn't meet the WP:GNG requirements. Ajf773 (talk) 21:58, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The single listing from a contest does not demonstrate encyclopaedic notability for this society, nor are searches, including Indian media searches, finding anything better. Fails WP:ORGDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.