Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susan Olmetti

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 15:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Susan Olmetti

Non-notable artist. 18 Google hits. Of the references in the article, three offer one sentence mentions or are mere listings, one doesn't mention her, and the Globe and Mail article (to be found free here) looks promising at first, but is actually an article about the Chelsea Hotel which mentions her in its first paragraph. Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 10:04, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Iain99^{Balderdash and piffle} 10:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - vanity article for non-notable artist. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:37, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The coverage is brief, but it is still multiple coverage from reliable sources. --Eastmain (talk) 23:07, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only detailed quotes/references relate to the Hotel Chelsea, not the artist. The bare fact that someone has been in the news does not in itself imply that they should be the subject of an encyclopedia entry. The remaining references show no in depth-coverage from a reliable source that rises above the day to day listings any artist would have, so fails WP:BIO. Fountains of Bryn Mawr (talk) 03:09, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: The subject of this article has called the WMF office to request the page be deleted (ref - OTRS Ticket #2008031710024575). --Versa geek 23:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete probably deletable anyway, but the subject's request pushes it well over the edge.--Doc^g 17:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete while the subjects wishes really are not relevant to the decisions we make here, I don't think an acceptable level of notability has been established. _(1 == 2)^Until 22:15, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Borderline BLP, requested deletion, no-brainer. FCYTravis (talk) 01:22, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.