Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Study hall

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep. Per WP:SKCRIT #1, nomination withdrawn and no other delete !votes outstanding. No need to prolong further. (non-admin closure) Britishfinance (talk) 00:08, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Study hall

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically a WP:DICTDEF, padded with lots of WP:OR. The one reference doesn't really talk about the subject in a way that meets WP:GNG, and my own searching doesn't find anything better. Tagged for improvement for ten years. As a WP:ATD, maybe a soft-redirect to wikt:study hall. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. -- RoySmith (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn given the improvements. -- RoySmith (talk) 19:28, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or redirect: I agree with the nominator. WP:NOTDICT. Lightburst (talk) 15:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve. I have found it trivially easy to find sources examining the utility of study hall as an element of education. I have added three the article. BD2412 T 03:37, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:BEFORE, WP:HEY, and WP:NEXIST. There's a huge number of good sources online, and nominating this is carelessness. Bearian (talk) 18:13, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added a bit, and it still needs more citations, but it clearly is a topic with plenty of sourcrs, and it passes GNG. — Grand'mere Eugene (talk) 19:23, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KaisaL (talk) 02:22, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Why was this relisted? The nominator withdrew the nomination. -- Toughpigs (talk) 05:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Changed my Ivote to get out of the way. WP:SKCRIT is met with the nominator's withdrawal. Lightburst (talk) 14:36, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.