Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snapdragon (Transformers)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Decepticons. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:13, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Snapdragon (Transformers)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional character, no reliable sources, and none of the non-reliable sources are even about the character. Black Kite (t) (c) 19:55, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom. BE——Critical_{__Talk} 20:35, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge List_of_Transformers:_The_Headmasters_characters#Decepticons the series he's from. Mathewignash (talk) 21:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no third person sources. Dwanyewest (talk) 19:38, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Not a true statement. There are third party sources. So ignore this vote. Mathewignash (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete. no 3d-person sources. So he's O-U-T. Got it? Pillhead Maddox (talk) 22:42, 16 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

The above editor should probably be ignored. He joined on the 15th, and on the 16th he started voting in deletion nominations and posting on the Transformer wikipedia project page. Most likely a sock puppet from any of the various puppeteers menacing the project. 198.51.174.5 (talk) 18:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it's a sock puppet. Mathewignash (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Non-notable, lack of reliable sources.--Korruski^Talk 12:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no third-party sources. Only sources are published by business partners of the creators which isn't enough to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 17:06, 22 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no reliable sources, is "sourced" to things that attempt to list every Transformer. For example, the first reference is a toy price guide. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:31, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.