Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skerries Community College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Skerries Community College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: non-notable school. Google search did not provide any evidence of notability or notable alumni. Quis separabit? 02:44, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The school is only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains^(talk) 03:11, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 03:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 03:40, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I always thought that schools serving this age group were inherently notable, coverage or not, notable alumni or not. I agree there is little to show notability. -Roxy, Zalophus californianus. barcus 11:50, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This RfC concluded that secondary schools are not inherently notable, Roxy. Cordless Larry (talk) 15:51, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It also concluded that this should not lead to AfD nominations for the sake of it! -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You guys don't make it easy, do you! -Roxy, Zalophus californianus. barcus 10:45, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a secondary school per longstanding precedent and consensus and for my usual reasons. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:33, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not enough reliable 3rd party sources to satisfy GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per the RfC that Necrothesp so delightful chooses to ignore. And so clearly states that SCHOOLOUTCOMES is not a relevant argument. The Banner talk 14:35, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, obviously you couldn't be bothered to read my other reasons! Apparently in your view all opinions that a secondary school is notable should be discounted. Because. you. are. right! -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:38, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per community consensus. Note that I had no idea that Necrothesp is an admin, was not intimidated, and the discussion here predates the discussion at AN. -Roxy, Zalophus californianus. barcus 05:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.