Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharanya Pradeep

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:59, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sharanya Pradeep

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. AmirŞah~~ 17:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)(sock strike. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:42, 20 November 2022 (UTC)) [reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Women, and India. AmirŞah 17:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Not done any significant role in the films listed in the article. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️ 17:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:26, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Besides Fidaa, her role in Baama Kalapam is also significant. She is listed as main cast in Gaalivaana as well. The filmography is about 13. So definitely accounts as significant person. Sivaraj (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails notability guidelines. Most coverage comes from her role in 1 film in which she didn't play a major role. Searches show that coverage in other sources is trivial. ProofRobust 23:08, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
She is an up and coming artist. She is not being talked because she is being cast in poor person roles like maid, even if the role is big like in Baama kalapam. Sivaraj (talk) 15:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sivaraj: "Up and coming" basically means "not yet notable". In rough terms, on Wikipedia, "she's talked about" equals "notable". "Should be talked about but isn't talked about because of reasons" does not equal notable. Largoplazo (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject has not got lead roles in multiple notable films as required for WP:NACTOR and there are no indications for GNG either. ─ The Aafī (talk) 17:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TNT and WP:NACTOR. First off, it seems to have been written by a 6th grader. It uses qualitative language about her roles ("bagged the role ... she acted in several ... she landed a major role ... reprising the role ... [she] is a hoot ... apt ... and brings a depth to the film."). None of that is quantifiable, but rather entirely opinion. A major re-write would have to be done. Technically, there is not significant coverage required for biographies of living persons. I also note that it has all of the telltale signs for deletion. Bearian (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.