Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahzada khurram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:47, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Shahzada khurram

non notable individual - page appears to be purely to advertise him. speedy delete removed without explanation by anon editor. noq (talk) 18:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 18:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no real assertion of notability.-Binary TSO ^??? 09:19, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, note that AFD notice has been removed by same anon editor Per Ardua (talk) 09:47, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Completely non-notable. Has anyone else wondered why an IP editor can't nominate an AfD, but can remove prod's? Niteshift36 (talk) 14:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - --Orange Mike | Talk 18:53, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 04:29, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete A7. No point letting this sit out there for long. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 04:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Salih (talk) 04:42, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.