Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ross copperman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-31 05:33Z
Non-notable musician. One out-of-print album, one self-released album. Pure vanity text, the sole contributions to Wikipedia byRedHeadNYC (talk · contribs). PROD tag added, but removed without comment by an anon IP -- ITS only contribution to Wikipedia. Calton | Talk 04:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Currently, he fails WP:MUSIC; there isn't enough coverage and the major-label album isn't released yet. This is ignoring the fact, too, that most of the text of the article is lifted directly from the sites given. Crystallina 05:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - multi-source copyvio, fails WP:MUSIC. MER-C 09:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:BIO. ~ IICATSII punch the keys 10:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:MUSIC and WP:BIO so not notable. Jayden54 20:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete compared to such policies as WP:MUSIC, WP:BIO and WP:COI. Danny Lilithborne 22:01, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.