Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rooslina Weti Pg Kamaluddin
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Rooslina Weti Pg Kamaluddin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:BIO. Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Complete lack of significant coverage. LibStar (talk) 03:11, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brunei-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 00:57, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. LibStar (talk) 00:58, 23 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. There is no special SNG or presumption of notability for ambassadors, so the GNG/WP:BASIC applies. I could not find any significant coverage in reliable sources: there seems to be little more than a few passing mentions in the press. I could not identify any logical alternatives to deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.