Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rilezu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Verifiability is necessary but not sufficient for inclusion - happy to discuss that on my talkpage Fritzpoll (talk) 08:46, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rilezu

Non-notable. Rilezu appears to be the name of a website selling animation cels. Janke | Talk 10:09, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 14:59, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. —Farix (Talk) 16:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete At best, it is an unverifiable WP:DICDEF. There is no indication in the article that it is about a company nor does Google search turn up any such company with that name or that it is a brand name. --Farix (Talk) 16:56, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Googling for "Rilezu" I found plenty of places that sell these things, by that name. That is what they are called, and the fact that they exist, is quite notable for fans of anime. Finding out the Japanese name for them, will most certainly show a lot more results. Perhaps the Japanese wiki can also be checked for information, if anyone who speaks Japanese passes by this way, and decides to have a look. Dream Focus 10:08, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Simply existing does not make something notable. It is still nothing more then an unverifiable WP:DICDEF, which is a violation of WP:NOT. And any definition Wikipedia gives without being sourced to a reliable source will be original research. --Farix (Talk) 11:00, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete this is apparently the name of a product that is not covered in any reliable sources independent of the manufactuers of the product. Where are the reliable sources independent of the subject that might establish notability for this?Bali ultimate (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into cel. The topic of rilezu is already almost being covered in the "collector's item" section, after all. --Gwern (contribs) 18:34 2 June 2009 (GMT)
BTW, should the nominator also vote? In that case, my vote is delete... but that should already be apparent! ;-) --Janke | Talk 06:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um, yes, the nominator is always assumed to have argued for deletion unless they specify otherwise (like "procedure nomination, abstain") in the nomination. —Quasirandom (talk) 14:40, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, doesn't appear to be a notable product. Second choice redirect to cel, third choice merge there. Stifle (talk) 08:18, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.