Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Sweden Democrats. Legoktm (talk) 03:26, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Riks

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is too little here for a separate article. Should be selectively merged (and redirected) into the parent, Sweden Democrats. This article has been created once or twice before by a sockpuppet, as Draft:Riks, and was turned down and deleted. gidonb (talk) 22:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Politics, and Sweden. gidonb (talk) 22:22, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Sweden Democrats seems like a good editorial decision.Draken Bowser (talk) 08:27, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - two in-depth sources from newspapers meets GNG. It is fine for an article to be a stub, and there's a reasonable expectation it could be expanded in the future as time goes on. matt91486 (talk) 18:53, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then why not merge now without prejudice to having an article sometime in the future, if someone would be inclined to write a proper WP:SPINOFF for Sweden Democrats? Are we or aren't we editing the encyclopedia as it is? gidonb (talk) 16:06, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 18:36, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Merge, with no prejudice to have an article once there's actually content. I think Riks is notable enough for an article of its own, but if there isn't enough content, the best editorial choice seems to be to have a couple of sentences in the Sweden Democrats article until someone can write a proper article about Riks. /Julle (talk) 22:19, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.