Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rico Puestel
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 06:51, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vanity page; non-notable. User has removed deletion notice twice. Stezton 00:38, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Notable musician. Several records. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 14:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Appears to be an actual musician. Article needs a lot of work though. Artw 14:45, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete - This article is vanity. The creator and only editor of this page is Ricopuestel (Talk | contribs). By reading the article, you can see that the page was most likely written by Rico. On top of this, most of the article on wikipedia is a direct copy from the about tab on his site. Definitely a candidate for deletion based on vanity. The links on the bottom of the page include two links where readers can buy records. Advertising gets deleted too. If the page wasn't vanity/advertising produced by Rico, my vote might change. Google search ("Rico Puestel") yields 7970 results, and he does have several records released/upcoming. I would say that he would be more notable than several musicians which have been allowed to exist on Wikipedia. In summary, the article is blatant vanity/advertising as it was written by Rico, is a direct copy off his site, and links to two pages whose only purpose is to sell records. Keep per changes. Fopkins | Talk 16:22, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I rewrote the article to address some of Fopkins' concerns. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 09:39, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but cleanup. Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 14:08, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep if someone cleans it up. Aye-Aye 17:24, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.