Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Curtner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Nosebagbear (talk) 17:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Curtner

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Federal public defenders are not inherently notable. The subject lacks in depth, secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. Only mentions I could find were passing mentions that are WP:ROUTINE for many lawyers and public defenders. Let'srun (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and Alaska. Let'srun (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. Like the nom, I could not find any reliably-sourced significant coverage of the subject that would satisfy the notability guidelines. Sal2100 (talk) 21:33, 20 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let'srun, WP:ROUTINE is a section within the Notability (events) guideline.

Rich Curtner is not an event.

--A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 03:33, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.