Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhode Island Urban Debate League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:22, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rhode Island Urban Debate League

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a non-notable club. Almost nothing found on google, all sources appear to be affiliated or local. Valereee (talk) 16:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. Valereee (talk) 16:15, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Education. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:24, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree. 172.59.210.195 (talk) 16:33, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - insufficient citations to establish notability, and the mentions cited are trivial.

CapnPhantasm (talk) 20:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:18, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.