Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randolph Hobson Guthrie III
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Shimeru 03:27, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Randolph Hobson Guthrie III (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested WP:PROD that fails WP:BLP1E and WP:NOTNEWS. The only claims to notability are the criminal charges and the fact that he is from a wealthy family. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:32, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:BLP1E. Joe Chill (talk) 18:33, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Notability is substantiated by coverage in multiple major media sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtbobwaysf (talk • contribs) 15:57, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Per WP:BLP1E, person is only notable for this one event, no coverage for anything else. TNXMan 17:20, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per WP:BLP1E. One criminal act originated all the news coverage, which ceased soon after the event. --PinkBull 19:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.