Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purse Organizer
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. A glance at the Google search results indicates clearly that the (now expanded) stub is factually correct, so WP:V is addressed, but of course it still needs reliable sources. Sandstein 21:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Originally written as spam/advertisement. The article was tagged with a prod and then deproded and cleaned up. However the result is an absurd short article about a term that is not used that much (except in advertisements of course). Pascal.Tesson 15:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- fix it or delete it actually, purse organizers are pretty popular, but the article is so poor that it could be on wiktionary. I think we should just delete it and someone can start it over later... CchristianTehWazzit
- Comment my thoughts exactly. So long as the earth is not salted, no article is better than a crummy sub-stub. Pascal.Tesson 22:17, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and hold the Salt! FirefoxMan 00:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - one sentence doesn't a Wikipedia article make. B.Wind 02:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It's been reasonably expanded since all the comments above were made. I think it's keepable now.--Kchase T 17:57, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Where are the sources? B.Wind 05:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.