Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porn 'n Chicken
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash 23:31, 10 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The article itself seems unsure if the events it mentions actually happened. Sounds like a bunch of nonsense to me, unencyclopedic even if true. At the very least, it needs major clean-up if it wants to be taken seriously. Garrett Albright 12:27, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup. A real movie of this name is found on the IMDB and the story has been covered by the New York Times (among the first Google results). Even if parts of this story is a hoax, it is notable enough. Uppland 18:25, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unencyclopedic, partially original research, and completely confused. -Soltak 18:27, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup. If I've heard of it, it must be notable. It was in TIME magazine for goodness sake. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 18:40, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup as above. Enough media coverage to warrant notability. 23skidoo 18:58, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Article as it stands is well-referenced. Capitalistroadster 19:01, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I've seen this movie. Redwolf24 20:44, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I cleaned up this article a lot. How's it look? Redwolf24 04:20, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I wrote the original, controversial entry. Actually, I wrote it originally for everything2, which may be why the tone was not appropriate for Wikipedia. Thanks to those who helped clean it up; I have tried to make it more encyclopedic myself as well. As for those who question the accuracy of the entry — it is as accurate as I can make it with the sources available. As noted above, I have provided copious citations. Uucp 13:37, 5 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Nice job on the cleanup Jehochman 17:57, 10 August 2005 (UTC) (Y'90)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.