Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pioneer Pekao Investments

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to UniCredit. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:57, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pioneer Pekao Investments

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP Imcdc Contact 09:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, and Poland. Imcdc Contact 09:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The company is likely notable (pl wiki article is a bit better, states it is the largest investment fund in Poland) but both our and pl are lacking independent refs. Quick GS search suggests sources exist (ex. [1]) but I am not motivated to fix this - the company should hire a PAID editor for that. They certainly can afford this. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:34, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:30, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - It is notable for its role and historical significance. Article needs to updated. According to this article, the firm has changed its name to Pekao TFI. Changeworld1984 (talk) 09:21, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Changeworld1984 - can you point to any in-depth sources which write about the significance of its role in history? HighKing⁺⁺ 14:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. So far we still are lacking in independent sources that provide significant coverage Imcdc Contact 14:21, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Unicredit, none of the sources meet GNG/WP:NCORP criteria for establishing the notability of *this* company, the sourcing all appears to rely entirely on information provided/published by the company, fails WP:ORDGIND as not "Independent Content". HighKing⁺⁺ 14:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Unicredit due to article's lack of viable sources to fulfill WP:NCORP. Though these may exist, I agree with the sentiment that this does not obligate us to keep or fix articles that don't have such. NicolausPrime (talk) 22:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.