Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petro gold

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Petro (cryptocurrency). Sandstein 21:55, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Petro gold

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable article about a new cryptocurrency that may never even happen. This is way too soon, fails WP:NOTNEWS, WP:GNG and it's clearly part of Petro (cryptocurrency). Prince of Thieves (talk) 13:05, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or merge with the main article per the reasons above.--Jamez42 (talk) 16:04, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- borderline A7 / G11; promo 'cruft on a nn cryptocurrency. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:22, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Petro (cryptocurrency); I'm not sure that's notable either, but for now any of Maduro's public pronouncements in this area can be covered there. power~enwiki (π, ν) 00:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Petro (cryptocurrency) has some significant mainstream attention due to being the only crypto-currency ever issued by a government, and the fact they did that to illegally evade economic sanctions imposed by the USA. I think that article is pretty safe. Prince of Thieves (talk) 00:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete way too soon, crystal ball type material, nothing solid yet. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 18:01, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Petro. This should just go under a section of that article, and this should just be a redirect to that section. I don't see why this needs to be an article per Smallbones's Crystal Ball reasonings. I do think it does belong somewhere with appropriate context, and the announcement being included in the Petro article services that.―Matthew J. Long -Talk-^☖ 00:57, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Petro. Does not meet GNG. (As an aside, George C. Parker would be proud of attempts to sell a "gold-backed" cryptocurrency regulated by the Venezuelan government.) Hrodvarsson (talk) 23:35, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.