Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pet Friendly's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete‎. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:05, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pet Friendly's

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, no secondary sources. This article has no sources that suggest notability, but only references to the subject's own website/blog. If we compare the name of the account that created the article, Cathalmoylan, with the name of one of the founders of the business, Cathal Moylan (mentioned in the article), it becomes obvious that there is a WP:COI. Even so, the article is not written in a promotional way, so it can't be speedied per G11. However, it's clearly not a notable business. Bishonen | tålk 22:57, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Philippines. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. It's non-notable with zero secondary sources out there. TheWikiToby (talk) 23:41, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink and Animal. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 03:33, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, Can't find any secondary sources, I can only find the website. 🍗TheNuggeteer🍗 03:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. I am unable to find any non-primary coverage of this small business at all, making it a failure of WP:NCORP. Rorshacma (talk) 16:17, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: It seems like a small business and there aren't any independent sources to show it's widely known or important. Also, the references all seem to be from the business itself, which raises concerns about potential bias. Waqar💬 18:38, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTPROMO --Lenticel ^(talk) 06:12, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: This should have been a candidate of WP:CSD A7 instead of bringing it here to waste time commenting in this AFD thread. All three sources are from blogs and the business' website. Ednabrenze (talk) 05:36, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a company therefore GNG/WP:NCORP requires at least two deep or significant sources with each source containing "Independent Content" showing in-depth information *on the company*. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. I'm unable to identify any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. HighKing⁺⁺ 15:24, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've marked the page for CSD A7 per WP:AVALANCHE. TheWikiToby (talk) 16:04, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.