Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pawan Pandit

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect may be created at editorial discretion, and protection/salting requested at WP:RFPP. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:12, 15 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pawan Pandit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable person, chairing a non-notable local organisation. Most sources only mention him in passing. Awards and Nominations section is unsourced. Yintan  12:42, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:37, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:37, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:37, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: Lack of substantial coverage in multiple secondary, independent and reliable sources makes ineligible for inclusion on Wikipedia. I had earlier boldly turned it into a redirect and it appears that an IP user has been repeatedly restoring it to standalone piece what this title doesn't deserve.
Here we have two options, we restore the redirect to Bhartiya Gau Raksha Dal and semi-protect the title, or just delete and get over this thing. Anup [Talk] 16:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Considering it's been recreated a few times, salting might be a good idea, yes. Yintan  10:16, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.