Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavlo Moroz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:46, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pavlo Moroz

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No claim to any notability. Fails WP:BIO. Deleted in Russian and Ukrainian Wikipedia. Mitte27 (talk) 11:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Mitte27 (talk) 11:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Mitte27 (talk) 11:13, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In spite of the article's state, the article passes WP:NPOL because it is equivalent to United States Deputy Attorney General, and WP:POLOUTCOMES states that Sub-cabinet officials [...] are usually considered notable, especially if they have had otherwise notable careers. ミラ P 19:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:55, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Miraclepine and my standards for lawyers. Bearian (talk) 22:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Obviously meets WP:NPOL. Ambrosiawater (talk) 03:09, 4 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.