Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pacific Grade Summit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 14:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pacific Grade Summit

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article since 2007, did ask a subject-matter expert for potential sources but they were only able to direct me to USGS and PeakVisor, neither of which includes significant coverage of the subject. Fails WP:NGEO. FOARP (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. FOARP (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:12, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NGEO, same as any other random hill. Can't find anything with actual good coverage, everything only shows weather, height, roads nearby, etc. and nothing to really qualify for a Wikipedia article.

Vamsi20 (talk) 14:25, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.