Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGG stack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to The 4-Hour Body. Interested editors please feel free to extract content from the page history and merge the content into other articles. Der yck C. 22:13, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PAGG stack

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a health supplement. The only reference that is about the supplement is to book published by the creator of this supplement. The others are about individual ingredients of the supplement, so don't contribute to the notability of the supplement itself (we already know, for example, that garlic is notable). Searching for "pagg stack" returns forum spam, advertorials and promotional blog posts, but not independent, published sources. There are therefore no independent, secondary sources to demonstrate notability of this subject. Prod contested, so bringing here for discussion. Sparthorse (talk) 17:13, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - None of the sources provide notability for the actual health supplement. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:17, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. None of the supporting sources are independent of the subject. Google searching finds only a press release. --MelanieN (talk) 20:25, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fork from the book. JFW | T@lk 20:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
merge to the book. A redirect is appropriate, not a straight delete--its a reasonable search term. DGG ( talk ) 21:49, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.