Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/One Tough Mother

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Charles Bukowski#Black Sparrow years. There's not quite consensus to delete, but also no real enthusiasm for keeping. The redirect to where this is mentioned in the main article is a compromise. The article can be restored if better sources are found. Sandstein 10:39, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One Tough Mother

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable DVD, no significant coverage by independent sources (sources in article are the official website and a personal blog), it appears that the events that the DVD covers might be notable and deserve mention on the poets article, but this DVD collection does not meet WP:NF BOVINEBOY2008 10:54, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Megan Barris (Lets talk📧) 11:20, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:32, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, - Flori4nK ^{t • c} 13:52, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete since I could not find sources to establish notability to warrant a standalone article. No objection to mention of this under articles of broader scopes. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 20:56, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Week keep The film stars Charles Bukowski, a notable actor, and the sources aren't really that bad. It could definitely benefit from more and better sources, but I am a bit inclined to give it a benefit of the doubt. Perhaps also draftify and re-source. Ambrosiawater (talk) 23:00, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.