Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oliver Garbutt Peeke
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 04:15, 10 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Oliver Garbutt Peeke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable local councillor. Fails WP:POLITICIAN because local councillors are not automatically notable, and fails WP:BIO because there is no evidence of significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject (the only independent source in the article is a passing mention in a local newspaper). BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:09, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 10:11, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The refs are there, but it's contrary in terms of meeting WP:ANYBIO too. Minimac (talk) 10:13, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources. Google News search for "Oliver Peeke" finds a couple of mentions in local news sites (including the ref already in the article) and a couple of mentions of a minor scandal to do with his Facebook page, but nothing that would constitute significant coverage to meet WP:BIO. Qwfp (talk) 12:05, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Clear WP:POLITICIAN case. Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 16:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Local councillors and party officials are generally NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 22:38, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.