Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olav sigurd kjesbu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that he passes the notability criteria for academics. (non-admin closure) Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:47, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Olav sigurd kjesbu

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the guidelines of WP:ACADEMIC and does not appear to have been the non-trivial subject of multiple independent reliable published sources. The list of external links given only prove that he exists, and existence does not equal notability. KDS4444^Talk 12:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom, self-promoting too Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:15, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. An h-index of 37 meets WP:NACADEMICS#1 in most fields, and I do not think that marine biology is one of the exceptions (though it is probably more borderline than some). The article, though, could do with some fairly thorough improvement (and a title correction) - as it stands, it would not be much of a loss to Wikipedia. PWilkinson (talk) 00:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems enough to satisfy WP:NACADEMIC JMWt (talk) 14:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep clear pass of WP:Prof#1. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Keep per Xxanthippe. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 08:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.