Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neath Port Talbot College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep per WP:SNOW. No policy-based reason for deletion. (non-admin closure) Exemplo347 (talk) 12:03, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neath Port Talbot College

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This organization is no longer in existence following a merger and is displaying incorrect information on Google which is causing us an issue NPTCGroup (talk) 12:36, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I understand where Google is an issue for you as the organization, but we have encyclopedic notability guidelines that probably find these former degree-granting institutions notable. Merging it into NPTC Group might be an option, but that would also require the merger of Coleg Powys (which is also up for AfD for the same reason and whose nomination I have consolidated into this one for your convenience). Someone more familiar with Google's display of Wikipedia articles may be helpful here. Raymie (t • c) 18:01, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For examples of other standalone articles we have on educational institutions that have been merged, see Cincinnati Conservatory of Music and Rutersville College. Raymie (t • c) 18:05, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Raymie. Even as a defunct scholl it is notable for its merge history as a higher education establishment. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 11:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Clearly notable topic. The institution's feelings about it are, as usual, irrelevant. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 14:07, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a defunct institution is still notable. Lepricavark (talk) 02:42, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep notable WP:GNG and WP:EDU.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.