Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muwema & Mugerwa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SNOW, but A7/G11 applies as well. Drmies (talk) 02:07, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Muwema & Mugerwa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This law firm does not appear independently notable per WP:CORP. Cited coverage is either self-published, WP:ROUTINE, or WP:TRIVIAL. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 17:45, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

delete all sources either self published, or not about the firm. Does not pass GNG. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:14, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable. --ЗAНИA ^talk ^{WB talk}] 21:38, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete To my opinion plain advertising (and an IP had removed the AfD-template). The Banner talk 20:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.