Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Modern Muse
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Mary Perkins. Sorry, IP editor but I see a consensus to Merge. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Modern Muse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable on its own, merge with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Perkins Rubymza (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Women, Arts, Organizations, Business, Companies, Education, Fraternities and sororities, Schools, Science, Engineering, Mathematics, Technology, Websites, and United Kingdom. Rubymza (talk) 23:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
- Merge seems like a good choice. She's perhaps more notable. Oaktree b (talk) 14:42, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Blatantly WP:PROMOtional, and the original creator was long ago blocked for WP:UPE. Opposed to the merge for the same basic reason, and also because a biography on someone who donated money to help found the organization and doesn't otherwise have any involvement with it doesn't warrant inclusion of any information about the organization itself in her article. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:10, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- Merge as above as per ATD, none of the sourcing meets GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability. HighKing++ 20:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is not a valid ATD. The article was created as probable UPE, is highly promotional in nature, there's no real usable sourcing, and the connection to the proposed target is extremely tenuous. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 21:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.