Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Minnesota Progressive Party

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Progressive Party (United States, 1948). Sandstein 18:58, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minnesota Progressive Party

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A non-notable state branch of the 1948 Progressive Party. Any useful information can be merged into the main article. Toa Nidhiki05 15:08, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics, and Minnesota. Shellwood (talk) 15:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It seems like you are making deletion nominations for a large number of similar articles. Would you like to consider bundling the nominations the next time you do something like this? 2601:647:5800:1A1F:4CAE:9DE2:30BC:86D9 (talk) 22:36, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please do not bundle the nominations. Down that road lies madness. Some of these may need to be merged, but the merger targets varry. Also one may be found to be notable. Each political party is different and stands or falls on its own, bundling is not at all a good idea.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:50, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect If it was a branch of the 1948 Progressive Party as you say, it seems appropriate to redirect it there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ironmatic1 (talk • contribs) 19:12, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.