Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Portoghese

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Even discounting socks, consensus is that this does not meet notability guidelines. JohnCD (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Portoghese

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This person does not appear to meet the notability guidelines at WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. Coverage in the article so far is a mixture of primary sources, a trival mention at MSN and a link to a list of awards that does not mention the subject. VQuakr (talk) 07:10, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can't see, or find, "Significant coverage in independent reliable sources" Chzz ► 14:42, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Press material / awards subject added.— Filmcanada (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The individual in question exists but is Non-notable. Google hits do not yield any significance Johnclean184 (talk) 04:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Agree with Chzz ► — Filmcanada (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Filmcanada was obviously created for the purposes of 'promotion, showcasing and/or advocacy.' TangSing (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.