Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Ovington
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Mike Ovington (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Ambassadors are not inherently notable. 2 of the 4 sources are primary. Fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 01:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, Bilateral relations, Oceania, and Australia. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 08:32, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: As per nom, Ambassadors are not inherently notable. Sources are either primary or not in-depth. // GMH Melbourne (talk) 23:59, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG and does not meet WP:NPOL.Onel5969 TT me 00:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.