Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Megaman (company)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 02:29, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Megaman (company) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GNG. Cannot find much external coverage. Reference are internal and the PDF one doesn't work. Imcdc (talk) 02:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 02:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 02:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 02:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I have found some regular PR coverage but nothing that would count towards WP:GNG/WP:COMPANY. The coverage provided in the article also falls short (two non-independent sources and a PDF which I could not open either). Modussiccandi (talk) 19:30, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.