Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McGill Street (Montreal)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. Stifle (talk) 12:59, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

McGill Street (Montreal)

Notability is not clear. Appears to fail WP:N in that no source (other than a local history) is likely to address the subject directly and in detail. -- Mufka ^(u) ^(t) ^(c) 01:06, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. —Eastmain (talk) 01:28, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I added some references. -- Eastmain (talk) 01:28, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep with added references. McGill Street is a nationally known street on par with Granville St in Vancouver. 23skidoo (talk) 01:45, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per references added by Eastmain: if he hadn't added these, I would have voted "delete". Nyttend (talk) 01:46, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per refs, though since I live here and didn't know where it was, maybe that should be a weak keep! (I've added where the street is to the article now, though). I'm not sure it's on a par with Granville street, to be honest. MadScot (talk) 02:48, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Reliable and verifiable sources establish notability of major street in major city. Alansohn (talk) 04:24, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - meets the usual requirements of WP:N; i see no reason to make an exception here. Wily D 12:27, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.