Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/McArthurGlen Designer Outlet Vancouver Airport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

McArthurGlen Designer Outlet Vancouver Airport

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable shopping centre. Consists of a list of stores and no reason it is notable. noq (talk) 22:34, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Usual links with News, Books, browser and Highbeam but nothing to suggest better. SwisterTwister talk 07:09, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for (1) failure to have a claim of notability and (2) lack of significant coverage. --Bejnar (talk) 01:14, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – The mall passes WP:CORPDEPTH. It has received significant news coverage in national Canadian sources, such as The Globe and Mail, Globalnews.ca, Globalnews.ca, and regional coverage as per The Vancouver Sun, BC Business. There is also local coverage, such as The Georgia Straight. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per NA1k. The article needs to be TNTed, since it is basically a directory in its current state, but the topic meets GNG. sst ✈ 14:46, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - agree with the other two keeps. VMS Mosaic (talk) 02:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.