Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lunaticks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Drmies (talk) 02:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Lunaticks (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This character does not establish notability independent of Ultraman Ace through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of overly in-depth plot details better suited to Wikia. There is no current assertion for future improvement of the article, so extended coverage is unnecessary. TTN (talk) 16:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Wikipedia is not a place for fan cruft. Articles must be encyclopedic and well sourced, notability must established. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 18:32, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:30, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable. I agree with the nom and Eduemoni. These Ultra Series articles were all created by sockpuppets, by the way. You might mention that he was banned from both Japanese and English Wikipedias for his disruptive editing that included these Ultraman articles. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.