Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luigikid Gaming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 22:01, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Luigikid Gaming

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable YouTuber. Possible A7 candidate, but I'm not super great with finding non-English sources. Hog Farm (talk) 14:42, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 14:42, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 14:42, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 14:42, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:GNG. The article about him was also deleted on German Wiki for the same notability issues. There are no mentions in reliable independent German sources - just social media and user generated sites. Less Unless (talk) 15:11, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no evidence of any notability at all. Like the nominator, I was also debating going for A7 but I've seen people argue that the viewership figures on these sorts of articles constitute a claim of importance. Either way - fails WP:GNG. Hug^syrup 16:15, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.