Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of teachers accused of sexual harassment
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by Doc glasgow. Arkyan • (talk) 17:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- List of teachers accused of sexual harassment (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
There are no sources - also this page is open to interpretation - anyone can be accused of a crime, guilt comes after a guilty verdict at a trial. Kernel Saunters 14:27, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - WP:BLP minefield. Otto4711 14:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete BLP disaster waiting to happen. I wouldn't even support a list of only convicted teachers, as the cases themselves are not really individually notable. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per above and I'm minded to blank the page pending the outcome of this debate. Sam Blacketer 14:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong delete per above, nothing but a headache waiting to happen. Arkyan • (talk) 15:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Delete What's the principle that applies here? Oh yeah, that whole "innocent until proven guilty" ideal that is a cornerstone of our court system. Even with "accused" preceding the list this is, as pointed out by Andrew Lenahan, a BLP disaster waiting to happen. This needs to be deleted quickly. --Cyrus Andiron
15:26, 9 May 2007 (UTC) - Speedy Delete. As it stands, it's pure libel. Stammer 15:35, 9 May 2007 (UTC) I blanked the page. Call me vandal. Stammer 15:42, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete. Not just libel, but a pretty nice trick of sexism too. One of the local police said at a recent town hall meeting that the ratio of male to female teachers involved in sexual harassment might be as high as 500 to 1, but hey, let's point out the women, right? --Charlene 15:44, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- Huh, right, I hadn't thought of that. Stammer 15:47, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.