Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of domain hacks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 04:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Original research, the list only limits itself to the few possibilities the editor can come up with, we've also got the domain hack search utility to find an endless amount of domain hacks for us, writing this article to completion would essentially mean listing every possible output of that search engine. Obli (Talk)? 19:11, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a mirror or a repository of links, images, or media files. Wikipedia articles are not:... 1. Mere collections of external links or Internet directories. Jll 19:24, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. jareha 20:21, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete yeah, it's an one thing to have a list of articles we have on sites or people that use domain hacks (eg Del.icio.us, Daniel J. Bernstein), another to have a list consisting entirely of external links. (And disclaimer: I added to this list. Twice. What was I thinking, again, I wonder? There are days when I can't recognize a dumb idea =/ ) I say pick a few good examples and discuss them on Domain hack - which it already does - and have that xona search thingy in xlinks - and it already has that too. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 12:14, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. wwwwolf said it best above. A domain hack category for existing articles on sites classifiable as such would be a quite welcome replacement. Rob T Firefly 01:18, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Good point. Category:Domain hacks would additionally solve the notability problem. jareha 01:46, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.