Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Linda Kurtz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Joyous! | Talk 01:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Linda Kurtz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

In theory there are two claims to notability, one being Miss Delaware, the other being a news anchor at the local level. The first is not enough on its own, and beyond that we actually lack any sources directly about it. My search on google came up with little. I did find this [1] which from the title does not strike me as a reliable source, and merely fact checks that Kurtz was Miss Delaware. Also this [2] extremely short blurb from the University of Delaware. The two sources we have here are her own website and the website of her employer. They prove she has worked in broadcast journalism, but nothing her shows her role in such has at all been notable. So she is a non-notable beauty pageant contestant and a non-notable broadcast journalist. John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:14, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Gabe Iglesia (talk) 15:51, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:12, 2 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.