Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyodong Elementary School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn. Article state at the time of nomination was "one of the oldest". Now it's the "the oldest", which as contributors have pointed out is a significant claim, backed up by citation. Another example of a HEY. (non-admin closure) ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 22:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kyodong Elementary School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NGEO and WP:NORG. Could be merged into a school district page in line with WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 22:47, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 02:22, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 02:22, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This school is not an ordinary primary school. It was the first modern primary school in South Korea. And I would like to expand a bit if you allow some time. --Cheol (talk) 22:08, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if the claims of being the first primary school and a pioneer in girl's (women's?) education can be sourced. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Have found a ref supporting claim of oldest school (see article - couldn't export a more reliable link, appreciation for any link-improvement). That along I would feel is sufficient to demonstrate notability, given the fairly lax nature towards schools. Some reasonable alumni, and there are some other articles, mainly on how its number of pupils has dropped rapidly, even compared to other SK schools.Nosebagbear (talk) 10:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: "oldest elementary school" is a sufficient claim of significance. An acceptable stub at this point. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:48, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.